I asked myself that question and did what I could educate myself on her political platform.I've seen her hold firearms with her finger on the trigger at audiences.
I've seen her object to debates on how the US Constitution applies to laws she supports.
And in this instance I should point out Illinois Senator Dick Durbin who supposedly defended Senator Dianne Feinstein's position with the dialogue, "None of these rights are absolute. None of them."
If I may, I'd like to add to Senator Durbin's quote to solidify its accuracy to Truth: "None of these rights are absolute [ANYMORE]." And it's because of Senators like Durbin and Feinstein that Constitutional scholars are forced into these debates about the limits of rights, because they hack and pick and slash at these rights as it suits them without considering the merits from which these rights found their birth.
And now she wants to question who has the right to our First Amendment?
How is she an elected representative of California? I was frightened to discover the reality: she is literally the best they have to offer.
Consider that for a moment. Dianne Feinstein is the best California has to offer to the United States Senate. Can you imagine someone worse? If so, I dare not ask what nightmares you suffer.
In other words, we are living in a time that is at the mercy of inept public servants who can barely acknowledge that politics are only possible because of such a powerfully written US Constitution, and yet they continually spit on it with every special interest group that sends them a campaign donation.
I fear for the future of this nation with every bit of news I heard out of Washington with little hope. There are only two current political figures I find have a passion for politics unbridled by the scruples of money. Those are Senators Rand Paul and Elizabeth Warren, and I am hard pressed to find another.
Please vote.
